The Fish Girl ([info]eruditepisces) wrote,
@ 2005-10-24 19:52:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: highly amused
Current music:"Les Yeux Ouverts" - The Beautiful South

This amuses me to no end...
Chris...however do you find these things? ;)

Reviews of Literary Classics From Morons

Here's just a sample:

(In reference to Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises):

“Here’s the first half of the book: ‘We had dinner and a few drinks. We went to a cafe and talked and had some drinks. We ate dinner and had a few drinks. Dinner. Drinks. More dinner. More drinks. We took a cab here (or there) in Paris and had some drinks, and maybe we danced and flirted and talked sh*t about somebody. More dinner. More drinks. I love you, I hate you, maybe you should come up to my room, no you can’t’… I flipped through the second half of the book a day or two later and saw the words ‘dinner’ and ‘drinks’ on nearly every page and figured it wasn’t worth the risk.”

And then this priceless gem...in reference to Nabokov's Lolita (which just so happens to be one of my favorite books of all time):

“1) I’m bored. 2) He uses too many allusions to other novels, so that if you’re not well read, this book makes no sense. 3) Most American readers are not fluent in French, so to have conversations or interjections in French with no translation is plain dumb. 4) Did I mention I was bored? 5) As with another reviewer, I agree, he uses a lot of huge words that just slow a person down. And it’s not for theatrics either, it’s just huge words mid-sentence when describing something simple. Nothing in the sense of imagery is gained. 6) Also, to sum it up, it’s a story about a pedophile.”

Okay, my ribs are sore from laughing at that one. Seriously. Hahahaha. The part about American readers not understanding French and using a lot of big words sounds eerily like a peer review I received for my latest short story. Hahahahahahaha. Priceless.




(Post a new comment)


[info]soulbain
2005-10-24 08:37 pm UTC (link)
You miss this gem concerning 1984:

“Don’t listen to anyone who tries to distinguish between “serious” works of literature like this one and allegedly “lesser” novels. The distinction is entirely illusory, because no novels are “better” than any others, and the concept of a “great novel” is an intellectual hoax. This book isn’t as good as Harry Potter in MY opinion, and no one can refute me. Tastes are relative!”

(Reply to this)


[info]isabelquinn
2005-10-24 08:46 pm UTC (link)
The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe

“I bought these books to have something nice to read to my grandkids. I had to stop, however, because the books are nothing more than advertisements for “Turkish Delight,” a candy popular in the U.K. The whole point of buying books for my grandkids was to give them a break from advertising, and here (throughout) are ads for this “Turkish Delight”! How much money is this Mr. Lewis getting from the Cadbury’s chocolate company anyway? This man must be laughing to the bank.”


HahahahahahahHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Although it would have been funnier if someone had said "This is plagiarised from the Bible!!"

Still, I guess something having status as a "classic" doesn't mean it has to appeal to all tastes. It irritates me how the english teachers at school seem to think that if we dislike something it just means we don't get it. I am referring to Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men in particular. I hated that book so much. Ack, year 11 english was painful. She kept getting annoyed at us for not doing any discussing, but whenever we'd offer an opinion and back it up from the text she'd just go "No, YOU'RE WRONG!"

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]isabelquinn
2005-10-24 08:46 pm UTC (link)
Bahahaha I ruined the page! How old-school COL of me.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]isabelquinn
2005-10-24 08:48 pm UTC (link)
Although... I guess it also depends on how you're being taught. Heck, I might have enjoyed that book under different circumstances.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]eruditepisces
2005-10-24 08:49 pm UTC (link)
Oh, god. I can't stand Steinbeck. *cries*
I just wanted to reach in the book and scream: "NO ONE CARES ABOUT RABBITS, DAMNIT! JUST SHOOT HIM!"

Er...not. ;)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]expanding_soul
2005-10-24 10:23 pm UTC (link)
bwahahahahahhaha

thanks for the laugh.
catcher in the rye is one of my favourite books...i'm fairly certain salinger didn't go into hiding over it. BUT WHO KNOWS, I COULD BE WRONG.

(Reply to this)


[info]agingdragqueen
2005-10-25 06:53 am UTC (link)
Catch-22 (1961)

Author: Joseph Heller

“Obviously, a lot people were smoking a lot of weed in the ‘60s to think this thing is worth reading.”

buahahaha, oh I like this site.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…